Abstract
Looking for alternative steel under different standard systems to ensure the orderly progress of engineering projects is an engineering problem that needs to be faced in the field of overseas civil engineering construction. In order to evaluate the substitutability of the European standard IPE 200 I-beam and the national standard I20a I-beam in the initial support structure of the tunnel, a mechanical model of the initial support structure of the tunnel was first established, and the model parameters were calibrated using the measured test data, so as to obtain the analytical solution of the internal forces of the initial support structure corresponding to the two types of I-beams. Furthermore, the substitutability of the two types of I-beams in the initial support structure of the tunnel was compared by taking the bending moment, axial force, and shear stress as evaluation indexes. The results show that the internal force distribution of the initial support structure does not change after the exchange of the two types of I-beams, but an acceptable multiple relation is generated in numerical value. When replacing the national standard I20a I-beam with the European standard IPE200 I-beam, it is necessary to ensure the construction quality of the arch top and arch foot, and some strengthening measures can be assisted if necessary.
Publication Date
11-24-2023
DOI
10.14048/j.issn.1671-2579.2023.05.031
First Page
182
Last Page
187
Submission Date
March 2025
Recommended Citation
Bo, LIN; Wenbo, XIE; Xiuliang, XU; and Lei, LIU
(2023)
"Case study on substitutability of national standard and european standard for I‑beams in initial tunnel support structure,"
Journal of China & Foreign Highway: Vol. 43:
Iss.
5, Article 31.
DOI: 10.14048/j.issn.1671-2579.2023.05.031
Available at:
https://zwgl1980.csust.edu.cn/journal/vol43/iss5/31
Reference
[1] 卢家森. 一种可行的欧标钢材和国标钢材的替换方案[J]. 钢结构, 2010, 25(1): 40-42. Lu Jiasen.A feasible replacement scheme for European standard steel and national standard steel [ J ].Steel structure, 2010,25 ( 1 ) : 40-42 [2] 沈擎. 中、美、欧钢结构柱脚连接构造及计算分析对比[D]. 郑州: 河南工业大学, 2014. SHEN Qing. Comparison and calculation of column foot connection structure of steel structure in China, America and Europe[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan University of Technology, 2014. [3] 何彦舫, 陶自成. 国际工程项目中美标准型钢产品替代研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2016, 18(3): 74-80. HE Yanfang, TAO Zicheng. Research on replacement of structural steel products between Chinese and American standards in international projects[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2016, 18(3): 74-80. [4] 赵建国, 张海军, 金凤诚. 国标钢材替换欧标钢材的原则、方案及设计要点[J]. 钢结构, 2013, 28(10): 31-35. ZHAO Jianguo, ZHANG Haijun, JIN Fengcheng. The principle, scheme and design points of substituting the European standard steel by Gb steel[J]. Steel Construction, 2013, 28(10): 31-35. [5] 文竞舟, 张永兴, 王成, 等. 钢拱架应力反分析隧道初期支护力学性能的研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2012, 45(2): 170-175. WEN Jingzhou, ZHANG Yongxing, WANG Cheng, et al. Back analysis for the mechanical properties of initial tunnel support based on steel arch stresses[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2012, 45(2): 170-175. [6] 孙闯, 张向东, 李永靖. 高应力软岩巷道围岩与支护结构相互作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(9): 2601-2607+2614. SUN Chuang, ZHANG Xiangdong, LI Yongjing. Analysis of interaction between surrounding rock and support structure in high stressed soft rock roadway[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(9): 2601-2607+2614. [7] 张德华, 刘士海, 任少强. 高地应力软岩隧道中型钢与格栅支护适应性现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(11): 2258-2266. ZHANG Dehua, LIU Shihai, REN Shaoqiang. Research on selection of steel and steel grid for tunnel support in soft rock with high geostress[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(11): 2258-2266. [8] 赖金星, 王开运, 来弘鹏, 等. 软弱黄土隧道支护结构力学特性测试[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2015, 15(3): 41-51. LAI Jinxing, WANG Kaiyun, LAI Hongpeng, et al. Mechanical characteristic test of tunnel support structure in weak loess stratum[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2015, 15(3): 41-51. [9] 李磊,谭忠盛,喻渝,等.成兰铁路千枚岩隧道初期支护形式试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(S1):19‑24. LI Lei, TAN Zhongsheng, YU Yu, et al. Experimental study on primary lining form of tunnels in phyllite on chengdu-lanzhou railway [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(S1): 19-24. [10] 谷拴成, 黄荣宾, 苏培莉. 考虑隧道围岩蠕变的复合式衬砌受力规律[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2018, 18(2): 53-60. GU Shuancheng, HUANG Rongbin, SU Peili. Force rule of composite lining considering creep of tunnel surrounding rock[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(2): 53-60. [11] LUO Y B, CHEN J X, SHI Z, et al. Mechanical characteristics of primary support of large span loess highway tunnel: a case study in Shaanxi Province, Loess Plateau, NW China primary[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 104: 103532. [12] 孙明社,马涛,申志军,等.复合式衬砌结构中衬砌分担围岩压力比例的研究[J].岩土力学,2018,39(S1):437‑445. SUN Mingshe, MA Tao, SHEN Zhijun, et al. Study on the ratio of lining sharing surrounding rock pressure in composite lining structure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S1): 437-445. [13] 梁政. 埋地管道对称水平弯头的弹性地基曲梁解[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 1989, 11(3): 65-74. LIANG Zheng. Solution to circular Arches on the elastic foundation of the symmetrical horizontal buried pipeline elbow[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 1989, 11(3): 65-74. [14] 谢继安.大跨隧道初期支护机理及近接隧道施工对其力学特征的影响[D].重庆:重庆大学,2017. XIE Ji'an. Research on the mechanism of initial support of large span tunnels and the influence of adjacent tunnel construction on its mechanical characteristics [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2017. [15] 蔡晓鸿, 蔡勇平. 水工压力隧洞结构应力计算[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2004. CAI Xiaohong, CAI Yongping. Structural stress calculation for hydraulic pressure tunnel[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2004.