Abstract
To investigate the influence of wheel load models on fatigue damage assessment of steel bridges, this paper adopted wheel load surface testing and finite element analysis to obtain the fatigue stress spectrum of typical fatigue details under traffic loads. Based on the cumulative fatigue damage theory, the differences in fatigue damage assessment caused by wheel load models were analyzed. The results show that the wheel load surface has an irregular shape, with the lateral contact size remaining constant and longitudinal contact size approximately linearly changing from zeroload to full load. The contact size under different loads can be determined by utilizing the linear interpolation method. Meanwhile, the evaluation results of the wheel load model in BS5400 and Japanese steel bridge specifications are higher than those of actual fatigue damage, while the evaluation results of the wheel load model in EURO-CODE and Chinese steel bridge specifications are lower than those of actual fatigue damage. The evaluation results of AASHTO specifications are closer to the actual fatigue damage, with the wheel load model exerting a significant influence on the fatigue damage assessment of steel bridges. In assessing the anti-fatigue design or fatigue damage of steel bridges, the influence of the actual wheel load model should be fully considered, and the actual wheel load model should be employed or the evaluation results based on the standard wheel load model should be corrected.
Publication Date
8-18-2022
DOI
10.14048/j.issn.1671-2579.2022.04.023
First Page
126
Last Page
131
Submission Date
May 2025
Recommended Citation
Shuai, MA and Li, YANG
(2022)
"Influence Analysis of Wheel Load Model on Fatigue Damage Assessment of Steel Bridges,"
Journal of China & Foreign Highway: Vol. 42:
Iss.
4, Article 23.
DOI: 10.14048/j.issn.1671-2579.2022.04.023
Available at:
https://zwgl1980.csust.edu.cn/journal/vol42/iss4/23
Reference
[1] 周细辉, 黄坤. 钢桥面板纵肋对接焊缝疲劳裂纹扩展特性及加固方法研究[J]. 中外公路, 2019, 39(3): 138-142.ZHOU Xihui, HUANG Kun. Research on fatigue cracking characterisitcs and reinforcement method for butt welded joints of U-ribs in steel bridge deck[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2019, 39(3): 138-142. [2] 周晖, 施刚, 王元清, 等. 钢桥疲劳评估研究进展[J]. 钢结构, 2013, 28(4): 1-6, 19.ZHOU Hui, SHI Gang, WANG Yuanqing, et al. Research progresses in fatigue assessment of steel bridges[J]. Steel Construction, 2013, 28(4): 1-6, 19. [3] IMAMB,RIGHINIOTISTD,CHRYSSANTHOPOU LOSMK.Fatigue Assessment of Riveted Railway Bridges[J].International Journal of Steel Structures,2005,5 (5):485-494. [4] ZHOU Y E. Assessment of bridge remaining fatigue life through field strain measurement[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2006, 11(6): 737-744. [5] AYGÜL M, AL-EMRANI M, URUSHADZE S. Modelling and fatigue life assessment of orthotropic bridge deck details using FEM[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2012, 40: 129-142. [6] YEN B T, HODGSON I C, ZHOU Y E, et al. Bilinear S-N curves and equivalent stress ranges for fatigue life estimation[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18(1): 26-30. [7] 崔闯, 卜一之, 张清华, 等. 基于热点应力法的正交异性钢桥面板疲劳寿命评估[J]. 桥梁建设, 2014, 44(4): 62-67.CUI Chuang, BU Yizhi, ZHANG Qinghua, et al. Fatigue life assessment of orthotropic steel deck plate based on hot spot stress method[J]. Bridge Construction, 2014, 44(4): 62-67. [8] 祝志文, 钱六五. 基于有效缺口应力法的正交异性钢桥面板疲劳评价[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 42(9): 59-67.ZHU Zhiwen, QIAN Liuwu. Fatigue assessment of orthotropic steel bridge deck based on the effective Notch stress method[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2015, 42(9): 59-67. [9] 朱太勇, 周广东, 张欢, 等. 钢箱梁正交异性桥面板疲劳评估全空间S-N曲线研究[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(11): 210-217.ZHU Taiyong, ZHOU Guangdong, ZHANG Huan, et al. A full range s-n curve for fatigue evaluation of orthotropic bridge decks in steel box-girders[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(11): 210-217. [10] 祝志文,黄炎,向泽,等.货运繁重公路正交异性板钢桥弧形切口的疲劳性能[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(3): 104-112. ZHU Zhiwen, HUANG Yan, XIANG Ze, et al. Fatigue Performance of Curved Cutouts in Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks for Heavy-Haul Highways [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(3): 104-112. [11] 祝志文, 黄炎, 向泽. 货运繁重公路的车辆荷载谱和疲劳车辆模型[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2017, 17(3): 13-24. ZHU Zhiwen, HUANG Yan, XIANG Ze. Vehicle loading spectrum and fatigue truck models of heavy cargo highway[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(3): 13-24. [12] 陈斌. 基于WIM的疲劳荷载模型和钢桥疲劳性能评估方法研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2018. CHEN Bin. Research on fatigue load model and fatigue performance evaluation method of steel bridge based on WIM[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018. [13] 刘延芳, 周泳涛, 鲍卫刚, 等. 公路钢桥疲劳标准荷载推导方法研究[J]. 中外公路, 2012, 32(1): 164-169.LIU Yanfang, ZHOU Yongtao, BAO Weigang, et al. Study on derivation method of fatigue standard load of highway steel bridge[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2012, 32(1): 164-169. [14] BritishStandardInstitution.Steel,ConcreteandComposite Bridges-Part2:Specificat ions for Loads:BS5400-2:2006 [S].London:British Standard Institution,2006. [15] European Committee for Standardization.Eurocode1: Actionson Structures-Part2:Traffic Loads on Bridges: BSEN1991-2[S].Brussel:European Committee for Standardization, 2003. [16] American Association of State Highway and Transporta tion Officials(AASHTO).LRFD Bridge Design Specifications(Edition9):LRFDBDS-9[S].Washington,D C:American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2020. [17] 日本道路協会.鋼道路橋の疲労設計指針[S].东京:日本道路協会,2002. [18] 中交公路规划设计院有限公司.公路钢结构桥梁设计规范:JTGD64—2015[S].北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司,2015. CCCC Highway Consultants Co., Ltd. Code for Design of Highway Steel Bridges: JTGD64—2015 [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press Co., Ltd., 2015.