Abstract
In order to determine the optimal layout of the cross⁃diaphragms in the oblique small box girder, a prestressed concrete small box girder bridge with a 50 m span was taken as the research object, and its internal force under the load of the moving beam was numerically simulated and measured. First, the model was modified according to the measured stress data, and the maximum distance between the cross⁃diaphragms was determined by using the warping-limited normal stress. Then, the height and thickness of the middle cross⁃diaphragms were determined according to the deflection difference coefficient of the bridge span. Finally, according to the variation law of deflection of small box girder, the optimum number of cross⁃diaphragms was analyzed. The results show that the maximum distance between the middle cross⁃diaphragms is 13.1 m, and the setting of 1–2 middle cross⁃diaphragms will lead to excessive warping normal stress of the box girder due to excessive spacing. In the case of meeting the structural requirements, the larger height of the cross⁃diaphragms indicates smaller strain and better transverse distribution of load. With the increase in the thickness of the middle cross⁃diaphragms, the transverse load distribution effect is enhanced, but the too-large thickness will increase the dead weight of the bridge. With the increase in the number of middle cross⁃diaphragms, the transverse and longitudinal load distribution effects are enhanced, but in view of the influence of the dead weight of middle cross⁃diaphragms, increasing the number of middle cross⁃diaphragms will increase the deflection of the small box girder. In general, the installation of four middle cross⁃diaphragms is the most beneficial to the uniform stress of the small box girder and the stress of middle cross⁃diaphragms, and it meets the structural requirements. Further increasing the number of middle cross⁃diaphragms will significantly increase the deflection of the small box girder.
Publication Date
7-14-2023
DOI
10.14048/j.issn.1671-2579.2023.03.024
First Page
150
Last Page
154
Submission Date
March 2025
Recommended Citation
Xinhao, MAI
(2023)
"Study on optimal layout of cross ⁃diaphragm in oblique small box girder,"
Journal of China & Foreign Highway: Vol. 43:
Iss.
3, Article 24.
DOI: 10.14048/j.issn.1671-2579.2023.03.024
Available at:
https://zwgl1980.csust.edu.cn/journal/vol43/iss3/24
Reference
[1] 杜元. 基于大数据的装配式小箱梁桥病害发展规律及原因分析[J]. 中外公路, 2022, 42(1): 163-168. DU Yuan. Analysis of disease development law and causes of composite box girder bridge based on big data[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2022, 42(1): 163-168. [2] 唐先习, 徐岳. 混凝土T梁横隔板合理截面尺寸数值分析[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版), 2010, 31(1): 34-39. TANG Xianxi, XU Yue. Numerical analysis of reasonable diaphragm section size of concrete T girder[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2010, 31(1): 34-39. [3] 田康, 曾志斌, 王勋文. 正交异性钢桥面板构造参数的优化[J]. 铁道建筑, 2019, 59(8): 34-38. TIAN Kang, ZENG Zhibin, WANG Xunwen. Optimization of structural parameters in orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. Railway Engineering, 2019, 59(8): 34-38. [4] 张莉. 横隔板及几何特征对钢箱梁畸变效应的影响[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2013, 30(8): 68-73. ZHANG Li. Influences of diaphragm plate and geometric characteristics on distortion effect of steel box girder[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2013, 30(8): 68-73. [5] 赵维刚, 王新敏, 杜彦良, 等. 常用跨度铁路桥梁运行状态分布式监测与预警技术[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2015, 49(7): 1046-1051. ZHAO Weigang, WANG Xinmin, DU Yanliang, et al. Distributed running state monitoring and pre-warning of common span railway bridges[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2015, 49(7): 1046-1051. [6] 牛艳伟, 杜隆基, 曹宏恩, 等. 横隔板对装配式梁桥空间受力影响的模型试验研究[J]. 结构工程师, 2016, 32(3): 149-154. NIU Yanwei, DU Longji, CAO Hongen, et al. Experiment of diaphragm effect on spacial internal force distribution of precast beam bridge[J]. Structural Engineers, 2016, 32(3): 149-154. [7] 戴公连, 粟淼. 斜交连续钢箱梁桥横隔板布置方式研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2015, 32(9): 67-72. DAI Gonglian, SU Miao. Study of skew continuous steel-box girder bridge affected by diaphragms arrangement[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2015, 32(9): 67-72. [8] TUNG D H H, FOUNTAIN R S. Approximate torsional analysis of curved box girders by the M/R-method[J]. Engineering Journal, 1970, 7(3): 65-74. [9] 唐煜, 岳杰, 华旭刚. 基于人工蜂群算法的桥梁有限元模型局部刚度修正[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2021, 18(9): 2333-2343. TANG Yu, YUE Jie, HUA Xugang. Local stiffness correction for finite element model of bridge by employing artificial bee colony algorithm[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2021, 18(9): 2333-2343. [10] 赵楷林, 宗海, 祝青鑫, 等. 基于长期实测的南京栖霞山长江大桥车辆荷载分析[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 51(6): 979-985. ZHAO Kailin, ZONG Hai, ZHU Qingxin, et al. Analysis on vehicle loads on Nanjing Qixiashan Yangtze River Bridge based on long-term field measurement[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 51(6): 979-985. [11] 李如鑫. 高速公路扩宽桥梁设计研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2017. LI Ruxin. Study on design of widening bridge of expressway[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017. [12] 李传习, 李游, 陈卓异, 等. 钢箱梁横隔板疲劳开裂原因及补强细节研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2017, 30(3): 121-131. LI Chuanxi, LI You, CHEN Zhuoyi, et al. Fatigue cracking reason and detail dimension of reinforcement about transverse diaphragm of steel box girder[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(3): 121-131. [13] 谢旭, 黄剑源. 薄壁箱形梁桥约束扭转下翘曲、畸变和剪滞效应的空间分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 1995, 28(4): 3-14. XIE Xu, HUANG Jianyuan. Three dimentional analysis for warping, distortion and shear lag effect of thin walled box girder bridge under ristrained torsion[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1995, 28(4): 3-14. [14] 张元海. 设置跨内横隔板的箱形梁畸变效应分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2021, 54(11): 91-98. ZHANG Yuanhai. Analysis on distortion effect of box girders with inner-span diaphragms[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2021, 54(11): 91-98.
Included in
Construction Engineering and Management Commons, Other Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons, Statistical Methodology Commons, Structural Materials Commons, Transportation Engineering Commons